Build vs. Buy: The Property Management Software Dilemma in 2025

For property management companies, the software stack is the backbone of the business. It handles everything from rent collection to maintenance tickets.

The market is flooded with excellent SaaS options: AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi, DoorLoop.

But as your portfolio grows—distinctly if you manage complex assets like mixed-use developments, industrial warehouses, or a large fragmented portfolio in the Philippines—these "out of the box" tools start to feel like a cage.

The question for 2025 is: At what point does it make sense to stop renting your software and start owning it?

The Case for "Buying" (SaaS)

For 80% of property managers, buying is the right choice.

Pros:

• Speed: You can be up and running in 24 hours.
• Cost: Low initial entry (monthly per-unit fees).
• Compliance: Major players update their systems to match generic US/Global accounting standards.

Cons:

• The "Feature Vote" Problem: You are one of 10,000 customers. If you need a specific feature (e.g., "Integration with GCash" or "BIR-compliant receipt generation"), you have to wait for them to build it. They might never build it.
• Rising Costs: As you scale to 500+ units, those "small" per-unit fees become a massive monthly overhead ($1k - $5k/month) that you never stop paying.

The Case for "Building" (Custom Software)

Building your own Property Management System (PMS) is not for the faint of heart, but it is the secret weapon of the industry giants.

Pros:

• 100% Workflow Match: We build the software around your operations, not the other way around. If your maintenance team needs a specific photo-upload checklist before closing a ticket, we build exactly that.
• No Per-Unit Fees: You pay for development once. Whether you manage 100 units or 10,000 units next year, your software cost doesn't triple.
• Asset Value: Proprietary software increases the valuation of your management company. You own the IP.
• Local Payment Integrations: Especially in the Philippines, SaaS tools struggle with local gateways (GCash, Maya, DragonPay). A custom built allows seamless direct integration.

Cons:

• Upfront Cost: Higher initial CAPEX.
• Maintenance: You need a technical partner (like Medianeth) to maintain the system.

The "Hybrid" Approach (The Sweet Spot)

You don't always have to choose extreme binary options. In 2025, the best strategy is often API-First Development.

You might keep a core ledger system (like Xero or QuickBooks) for pure accounting, but build a Custom Tenant Experience Layer on top.

What this looks like:

1. The Backend: We use a robust database (PostgreSQL) to store your complex tenant data.
2. The Frontend: We build a branded, mobile-first Web App (Next.js) for tenants to pay rent and request repairs.
3. The Integration: We connect specific modules (like accounting) to established APIs so you don't have to reinvent the wheel.

Who Should Build?

If you check 2 or more of these boxes, you are ready for custom software:

• You manage 100+ units.
• You are paying more than $1,000/month in SaaS fees.
• You find yourself using 3+ distinct "workarounds" (Spreadsheets, WhatsApp groups) because your current software can't handle a specific task.
• You want to offer a "White Glove" branded app to luxury tenants.

Conclusion

SaaS gets you started; Custom gets you ahead. If you are tired of molding your business to fit someone else's software, it's time to map out your own solution.

---

Thinking about building your own PMS? Contact Medianeth for a feasibility audit. We'll tell you honestly if you should stick with AppFolio or if it's time to build.

Related Reading:

• Real Estate CRM Integration Guide
• How 'All America Warehouse' Transformed Their Listings